🚚 on the house SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.5/5 from 512+ reviews
Toolsβœ“ In StockπŸ”₯ Bestseller 

Dewalt 60 v string trimmer no head

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…4.5 out of 5(512 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$41.25
$68.75
Sale
βœ“ at no charge delivery on this item β€’ Limited time offer

Tested working merely main part

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
hasty Shipping

↩️
plain Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

Dewalt 60 v string trimmer no head

Tested working purely main part​

This product is faultless for anyone looking for quality Tools products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 370825

Category: Tools > Power Tools > Other Power Tools

Original Price:$68.75 USD

Sale Price:$41.25 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand fresh

🚚 shipment & Returns

βœ“ complimentary shipment on orders over $50

Standard transport: 3-5 business days

Express fulfillment: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.5
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 8986 reviews
AC
Amber Carter βœ“ Verified Purchase
9 months ago Β· Columbus, OH
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Super happy​
I’ve had no issues with the Dewalt 60 v string trimmer no head yet.
25 people found this helpful
MW
Michelle Walker
1 month ago Β· Fresno, CA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
definitely impressed
For the price, the Dewalt 60 v string trimmer no head is practical and it’s fine overall.
38 people found this helpful
LN
Lauren Nelson βœ“ Verified Purchase
4 months ago Β· Sacramento, CA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
ultimate Dewalt 60 v string trimmer no head ever
At first, it feels solid enough and it’s fine overall.
14 people found this helpful
AR
Aaron Roberts βœ“ Verified Purchase
2 weeks ago Β· Tulsa, OK
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
superb investment
Highly recommended Dewalt 60 v string trimmer no head! Already shared with my friends. adore the quality!
24 people found this helpful
SL
Stephanie Lewis βœ“ Verified Purchase
8 months ago Β· San Diego, CA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
outstanding Dewalt 60 v string trimmer no head
The Dewalt 60 v string trimmer no head works consistently so far.
2 people found this helpful